Replies to LegCo questions
LCQ14: Code of Practice for keeping of dogs on construction sites
Following is a question by the Hon Choy So-yuk and a written reply by the Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food, Dr York Chow, in the Legislative Council today (December 20):
Question :
According to the Code of Practice for the Keeping of Dogs on Construction Sites
in Hong Kong issued by the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD),
upon completion of a project on a construction site, the contractor concerned
must re-home and move the dogs on the site (construction site dogs) to a new
location. If there is no alternative, the officer-in-charge of the site should
surrender them to AFCD. It has been reported that although a number of
large-scale contractors signed the above Code last year, there are still about 4
000 construction site dogs which become stray dogs every year, indicating that
some contractors have not complied with the Code. In this connection, will the
Government inform this Council:
(a) of the respective estimated current numbers of construction site dogs in
Hong Kong and those which were abandoned;
(b) of the total number of construction site dogs surrendered to AFCD in the
past year;
(c) of the number of non-compliance cases (including failure to have the dogs
licensed, or cause the dogs to be vaccinated against Rabies and micro-chipped)
found in the past year by AFCD during its inspection of construction sites to
ensure contractors' compliance with the above Code; and for cases in which the
dog owners were penalised as a result, of the number of construction sites and
the penalties involved; and
(d) whether it will consider enacting legislation to enhance regulating the
keeping of dogs on construction sites, in order to prevent construction site
dogs from being abandoned; if it will, of the details; if not, the reasons for
that?
Reply :
Madam President,
(a) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) does not have
the estimated number of dogs at construction sites in Hong Kong. However, past
statistics of dogs caught in construction sites show that they were mostly stray
dogs. In 2005, AFCD caught 468 stray dogs during inspections to construction
sites.
(b) In 2005, AFCD received about 3 000 dogs. We do not keep separate figures of
dogs surrendered by construction sites.
(c) In 2005, AFCD made 254 inspections to construction sites. Separately, during
the same period, there were about 480 cases of prosecution against owners
failing to license their dogs and about 130 cases of prosecution against owners
letting their dogs go astray. However, as the keepers of dogs found in
construction sites are hard to establish, there were no prosecutions against
construction sites by AFCD in 2005.
(d) AFCD has reached a consensus with the relevant department that from October
2006 onwards, there will be special specification in the contracts of all new
public works requiring the contractors to obtain licences for the dogs in the
concerned construction site and have the dogs neutered. If there are stray dogs
in the sites, the contractors must notify AFCD and provide means for AFCD staff
to enter into the site and remove the stray dogs. The contractors must also
follow the Code of Practice for the Keeping of Dogs on Construction Sites in
Hong Kong issued by AFCD, which include a prohibition on dog abandonment. The
Government considers that this arrangement will alleviate the problem of
construction site dogs. The Government will consider to promote the relevant
clauses to other private development companies and public development
organisations.
Ends/Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Issued at HKT 12:33
NNNN