Replies to LegCo questions
LCQ 17: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Following is a question by the Hon Fred Li Wah-ming and a written reply by the Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food, Dr York Chow, in the Legislative Council today (April 26):
Question:
In December 2003, the Government advised this Council that it planned to extend
the application of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety ("the Protocol") to Hong Kong for better protection of
biological diversity in Hong Kong through the regulation of the import and
export of living modified organisms ("LMOs") (i.e. any living organism that
possesses a novel combination of genetic material obtained through the use of
modern biotechnology). The Government indicated in April last year that it was
still working on the introduction of new legislation to implement the Protocol.
In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
(a) whether the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department has breached
the principles and regulations in the Protocol by distributing
genetically-modified papaya seeds and seedlings to farmers (including those
engaging in organic farming) last year;
(b) whether the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau and the departments under its
purview have been involved in the legislative exercise mentioned above; if so,
of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and
(c) given that the Protocol stipulates that any exporting country of LMOs should
obtain an advance informed agreement from the importing country, provide a risk
assessment report indicating that LMOs will not pose adverse effects on
biological diversity and human health, label LMOs in a clear manner and provide
the relevant information, whether it will, by drawing reference from the above
precautionary approach, consider implementing a mandatory labelling system for
genetically-modified food in Hong Kong; if so, of the considerations involved;
if not, the rationale for that?
Reply:
Madam President,
(a) The primary objective of the Protocol is to protect individual signatories
to the Protocol from potentially adverse impacts of arising from the
trans-border movement of imported LMOs on their biological diversity through the
regulation of import and export of LMOs. China has signed and ratified the
Protocol and formally became the signatory to the Protocol since September 2005.
We have also obtained the approval in principle from the Central Government to
extend the application of the Convention on Biological Diversity and its
Protocol to Hong Kong. Subject to the LegCo's approval of our draft legislation
and completion of other preparatory work, we will make a formal request to the
Central Government to complete the necessary procedures to extend the Convention
on Biological Diversity and its Protocol to Hong Kong.
Whilst the Cartagena Protocol (the Protocol) has yet to be extended to Hong
Kong, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) remains very
vigilant about the transfer, handling and use of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs)
in order to ensure the ecological balance of our natural environment and
conserve the biological diversity of Hong Kong. In the context of promoting
organic farming in Hong Kong, AFCD, when introducing seedlings for experimental
planting, would strive to ensure that the seedlings do not contain any
genetically modified materials by requiring written certification from suppliers
and conducting sampling tests, etc. Upon discovery that the papaya concerned
might contain genetically modified materials, the department has acted
immediately to destroy all papaya plants and conducted an in-depth
investigation. The measures taken were in line with the basic principles of the
Protocol.
(b) As the provisions of the Protocol are not related to food safety, there is
no need to extend its content to the food safety legislation of Hong Kong.
(c) The Protocol provides that trans-boundary movement of LMOs for direct use as
food, feed or for processing must be accompanied by import/export documentation
that clearly indicates that it "may contain" LMOs and expressly states the
intention not to release the LMOs into the environment. But this provision is
not targeted at genetically modified food on sale after import, such as at
wholesale and retail levels and has no binding effect on such levels.
On setting up a labelling regime for genetically modified food, the Codex
Alimentarius Commission of the United Nations is working on a uniform standard
but the work is unlikely to be completed soon. Since the international community
has yet to reach a consensus on the labeling of genetically modified foods, we
need to consult the trade and various sectors concerned before deciding whether
to implement a mandatory labelling system for genetically modified foods in Hong
Kong. But we will work with the trade to study the proposal for drawing up a
guideline for voluntary labelling to help the trade ensure that the claims made
for the genetically modified elements of their products are true and accurate.
Ends/Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Issued at HKT 13:07
NNNN